Twitter Tweets about Privacy as of July 09, 2009
antonvowl: Might be worth someone looking into how Murdoch pubs have covered govt databases, privacy, snooping state etc
ozdj: @warrencammack They'd be an incredible competitor if they got a licence. The fuss made over gmail privacy would look very minor indeed.
rajeevmax1: RT @kevglobal: RT @cucchiaio: If Google was your roommate: http://bit.ly/6cdjn #privacy #cohabitation
dkpto: is reading Facebook's privacy letter to the Danish Data Protection Agency: http://bit.ly/TKrOM
security4all: @domdingelom they'd better concentrate on serious ecrime then this. What about privacy? Are they allowed to look at my netbook while in car?
alexqs: @KathrynBW Very well done, your privacy is the first thing. I hope we can still contact with you, in the way you say to us
foxfold: @JulietEchoRomeo that's what I thought about steve's mum! Oh well - time to tweak the privacy settings on fb...
proxymasters: Concerned about privacy on the web then always surf via a web proxy site. No one, not even us,will know where you go. http://FOUNDOFTEN.INFO
moraser: Si limitano le intercettazioni per rispettare la privacy? Allora sarebbe coerente vietare anche le perquisizioni, sempre per la privacy.
LucienBurm: @randulo yeah, trying firegpg now. seems pretty good (privacy) ;-)
europeanprivacy: Google announces its operating system, initally for netbooks. Cnet.com gives its thoughts on privacy implications- http://bit.ly/8qPto
infomobster: Wondering if there was the same reaction to privacy (new mobile phone directory) when BT first launched the old skool landline version???
jasguyking: Invasions of privacy, and the meaning of the dichotomy thereafter discussed.
KiminNorCal: @ColorblindFish R u in SF or Concord or Sac orrrr??? I can come to u...neutral place. Not at all trying to invade your privacy.